On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:49:36PM -0800, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> > bug 1670: Added some new tags for AWL status
> 
> Do we still need this?  It's been requested once in 2 years.

It's trivial. I think the more available tags, the better, but we do
need to organize the man page better as it gets more cluttered...
 
> Also, it's not bug 1670.... which bug is it?

1683, sorry.

> > + _AWLCOUNT_        Number of messages on which AWL modicfication is based
> 
> typo

Fixed.

-- 
Duncan Findlay

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to