On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:16:20PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote: > > 2. It would change the test semantics. Currently each test is run on a > clean spamd. If the spamd was persistent, a test could fail because of > some bug hidden somewhere else. Not that finding ng these bugs was a bad > thing but it would make the tests a bit non-deterministic. >
Not to mention that most of the tests are testing different startup options for spamd (socket, ldap, port, allow_user_rules, syslog, etc etc). There may be some tests that can be grouped a little better and that will help. Michael
pgp5k4KfYy1jk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
