On Thursday 02 December 2004 21:01 CET Michael Parker wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:11:48PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 December 2004 17:06 CET Michael Parker wrote:
> > >[...]
> > > FYI, the FreeBSD failures are real (when they aren't the failed svn
> > > type).  For some odd reason, when running under buildbot, the
> > > spamd_unix.t tests are failing.  I can't recreate running outside of
> > > buildbot, so I'm not sure how to remedy.
> >
> > I haven't had a closer look at the stuff till now (remember?  I still
> > have no account on the box, could somebody *please* create one for
> > me?), but the tests are obviously not running with
> >   make test TEST_VERBOSE=1
>
> This is possibly a good idea, the concern would be how large the
> logfiles become.  Buildbot has problems with large logfiles.  [...]

Then BuildBot needs to be fixed ;~)

> > You should all add that var to your setups so we can get a whole lot of
> > more informations (including possible output on stderr).
>
> In this case the error is pretty obvious and is printed to stderr.  It
> only happens during make disttest and not during make test.  That is
> what makes the error so puzzling.

Ah, I had a look at the wrong test output.  Hmmm...  maybe some path name 
length restrictions it runs into?  But 117 vs. 94 chars?  Weird.  Or the 
dist directory is created with some weird permissions which don't allow 
sockets to be created inside?  (Just some wild guessing :)

Cheers,
Malte

-- 
[SGT] Simon G. Tatham: "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
      <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html>
[ESR] Eric S. Raymond: "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way"
      <http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>

Reply via email to