[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes: > as a matter of interest -- I guess this is for Daniel -- why is that > debug-area-splitting-and-validation code not part of Mail::SpamAssassin, > anyway?
IIRC, I think I did it that way because spamd, spamassassin, and mass-check used slightly different options and semantics for the debug options and moreso because it simplified the API especially around "all" vs. none (undefined, false), etc. It was quite deliberate on my part. I'm fine with moving it all into Mail::SpamAssassin *if* the command-line semantics can be roughly preserved. -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
