http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-06 02:06 ------- Hello Michael, now as plain text. You stated that the development of bug# 1201 started. Because i'am very interested getting this feature i want to talk about the realization. Now i already started the development of this feature by my own, as stated here before: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201#c21 Pherhaps there are some intersections between my dev to your road map. In my DSCLearner (DomSpamC Learner module => SpamC part for Lotus Domino) i've planned to use the "int flags" variable to submit the LEARN command and i say "learn option". "learn option" specifies that the message will be learned or unlearned. So the protocol could be for learn a spam message "LEARN SPAM SPAMC/1.3" Pros for this would be that only a small change to the libspamc is needed. Would a protocoll version change needed? A code example of initial spamc part: g_DomSpamCConfiguration.flags |= SPAMC_LEARN | LEARN_SPAM; if ((ret = transport_setup(&g_DomSpamCConfiguration.trans, g_DomSpamCConfiguration.flags)) == EX_OK ) { if (ret == EX_OK) { ret = message_filter(&g_DomSpamCConfiguration.trans, tempSendToUserName, g_DomSpamCConfiguration.flags, m); sprintf( strTemp, "Return-Code (ret) from SpamD: %i", ret ); WriteToNotesLog( strTemp, 0 ); } } If you're interested i'll take the spamc-part!? Best regards. NicoP. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
