http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4031
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-15 07:02 ------- Subject: Re: bayesian scores lower for higher probability On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 03:22:17AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It could be a setup/install problem but... I wiped everything and > reinstalled. > Then I fed the learning engine with fresh spam, ham, false > positives/negatives. Results are the same. 1.9 BAYES_99, 2.1 BAYES_95. Of course they didn't change. The scores aren't dynamic, they're generated once before a release. > 90% of false negative I had switching to 3.X could have been catch if score > > was linear. The "problem" here is that BAYES_99 causes FPs, which the perceptron handles by lowering the score since a billion other rules usually hit on the spam. This isn't a scoring issue, it's a learning/bayes issue, if anything. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
