-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes: > It's moot at this point, and I meant to vote -0.5 and not -1 BTW. > I wanted more of a "I'd rather not yet" versus "NFW". It was more of > a shock of nothing at all for weeks about a release, then suddenly, > the one night I'm not sitting online, a bunch of stuff happens and a > release occurs. I suspect something must have happened in IRC. I wasn't there either ;) > Anyway, as for reasoning -- I have been having conversations with the > Habeas folks to get this code/support into 3.0.2. Per my last message > I've already explained how since there wasn't any discussion for weeks > now wrt a release, there wasn't extreme urgency in doing a code review. > Had I known there was going to be a release tonight/this week/this > month, I would have made an effort to free up enough time to do the > review beforehand. ouch. agreed, that's not too hot, but it's really more the fault of the 3.0.2-vs-Future slip-up... - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFBwd0MMJF5cimLx9ARAof2AKCDONL0rxTpUp1PAz235m3+yrG8oQCcC2cT CUrT/jr91f0fXtjkqqC3Lw4= =ObJV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
