-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael Parker writes:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 04:41:51PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
> > 
> > makes sense to me.   I'd (a) expand the doco, and (b) use a better
> > name than "verify_user" for the method, as it took a while for me
> > to grok it.
> > 
> > rather than "verify_user", how's about "service_acl_allows_username" or
> > similar?
> > 
> 
> Opps, missed the whole what this thing does blurb in the POD.
> 
> I'm horrible at naming things, how about
> "services_allowed_for_username"?

ok -- "service_allowed_for_username" -- there's only one service for
each call. ;)

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFBw4oSMJF5cimLx9ARAhMtAJwN4GSgjguoknqE5xN7N+pzh1CpUgCfR3od
9gPZvN1mY7cG9TnmawXKVWc=
=QVqw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to