http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3821
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-24 07:17 ------- I think the reaction time of the online blocklists plays into this alot. I increasingly see spam come in that treads around 4 points because it's listed only on a couple of lists. When I scan it again half an hour later, more lists have it and it scores 6 points and above (not taking in bayes/awl changes). I just started collecting these - the most significant jump I noticed was from 2.2 (bayes_80+sbl) to 8.1 (+spamcop,ws,ob) the next day, with spamcop catching on after 3 hours, uribl's not after 8 (slept then =)). Verified using the checker at rulesemporium.com. This stuff definitly screws up the mass-check numbers. Quoting Daniel from Bug 3947: > Well, we want to move to using real-time data for network tests and that > would improve the scores, but it's a non-trivial amount of work (to log > complete network data in message headers, and then reuse it in > mass-check). Patches accepted. :-) Could it be an easy fix to derive some discounting factors based on the live data that we see, and to apply those in the scoring process? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
