http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4068
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-10 15:05 ------- Subject: Re: SpamAssassin doesn't follow RFCs 822, 2045, and 2046 The reason I jumped in on this one is because Exim has gone through a lot of problems in this area, particularly because of software that uses CRLF in a situation where you would expect LF only (e.g. sendmail -t) or which uses LF only where you would expect CRLF (e.g. various kinds of SMTP). There have also been amusing problems with ClamAV which also has to cope with line endings being CRLF or LF depending on how the message is fed to it - some months ago I had to fix one of the new upstream virus signatures because it assumed CRLF but in my environment the message had been converted to LF only. The current Exim line ending DWIM rules are documented at http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.40/doc/html/spec_44.html#SECT44.1 It's a perpetual problem area so this might not be the best solution. Tony. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
