-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Loren Wilton writes: > >> oh good, so you've changed your mind since > >> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id781#c3 then ;) > > >Somewhat. I still think it should be a plugin. > > There's a problem with plugins I hadn't realized when they were > originally being advertized as the universal solution to oddball > rules. The problem is that they aren't. > > Anyone can write a jive rule, if allow_user_rules is set. But nobody > but the system administrator can install a plugin. And it seems that > even invocations of a plugin aren't supposed to show up in the > user_prefs file, even with allow_user_rules. So to be useful here > (for the general case, which is what interests me) this would have to > be a plugin that effectively exported a new rule base name, and the > plugin would then take a general re against that base type. > > Which is the same as inventing a new rule base type, except that not as many > people will be able to use it. I'm not sure what you mean here. could you add some examples? - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFB4yycMJF5cimLx9ARAhEuAJ4klZ5AO0iSpMPZ2UtESkN26xX+iACgtyyG 6uGqWL2y8o0ozYhB5hnrjQE= =J/yK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
