http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4076
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-14 06:09 ------- Subject: Re: Incorrect user_prefs being used > Are you absolutely sure it is 3.0.2? I ask because there was a bug > like this in 3.0.0, but it was fixed. Yes, certain. It was installed from an RPM I found on the web. It reports itself as 3.0.2 to Webmin. > >> I have setup a whitelist_from in my own >> file, /home/jim/.spamassassin/user_prefs with a test email. I have sent >> a test >> email from my nominated external address to user jim on my box. >> Whitelist in >> user_prefs is NOT being applied. >> >> The same applies to blacklist_from. >> >> However, if I instead add the whitelist_from line to >> file /root/.spamassassin/user_prefs, the whitelist is applied >> successfully. >> > > Did this work before? How are you starting spamd? How are you calling > spamd? with spamc? are you passing in the username? Are you running in > a site wide configuration? I have never tried it before, as the box was only for my use. Now I have users who want to enter their own rules. My /etc/init.d/spamassasin file contains: SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -c -m2 -H" and my /etc/procmailrc contains: :0fw: spamassassin.lock * < 131072 | /usr/bin/spamc >> In other words, my user-level rules are NOT being applied, the values >> are >> always coming from root's user_prefs file, for all users. > > whitelist_* and blacklist_* are not "user-level rules" so... > >> >> I have used Webmin to enable the "allow users to define rules" in >> header/body >> tests, just in case this had an impact, but still no luck. >> > > This doesn't do what you think it does. This allows you to put new > rules in your user_prefs file and can be a security risk (hopefully > Webmin makes this clear before allowing you to turn it on). I thought that was the case, I was just concerned it was affecting the other functionality. many thanks! Jim > > > > > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
