Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yeah, that mostly sums up my feelings. The current RBL information tells > us when a positive lookup occurs, but not when a negative lookup occurs.
True, you have to assume a negative lookup if it doesn't show and the "reuse" mapping indicates it was present. I'll provide a way for people to disable reuse for rules that they normally don't run with. Note that even if some of those non-hits are due to downtime or timeouts or whatever, those *should* be considered as the realtime result since they affect accuracy. > I'd really like to have RBL record all queries made and the results > thereof, then all the issues above go away -- name changes and logic > changes just look at the cached result, rule additions w/out cached > result cause lookups at run-time as they are now. Maybe, but that is still off in the future. Huge delay to get that throughout all mail. We get 97% with names and 99% with names and dates. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
