On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 10:57:54AM -0600, Dallas L. Engelken wrote: > If the max children are hit doing SPAMC CHECKS, a SPAMC PING has to wait > until there is an available child to answer that ping right? Shouldn't > this be an exception, since a PING just wants the daemon to be > listening. Is there a way the parent process can answer the PING?
Not in the 3.0 design -- the parent has nothing to do with the socket. In the 3.1 design, I don't quite know if the parent accepts and passes, or if the parent just delegates who should answer. I think it's the latter, so in short, no. ;) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: I multitask... I read in the bathroom!
pgpdUI51I7rdQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
