http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4089
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-22 09:41 ------- This idea for a second bayesian filter is working really well. It is returning better accuracy than the bayesian filter that spam assassin comes with. As I posted originally - this second filter (using spamprobe) is not fed the entire message. It is only fed the headers (enhanced) and all http references, email addresses, and phone numbers within the body. And the results are extremely impressive. It generally returns the same results ar SAs bayesian filter except when the don't agree - it's because the second filter is right. In particualr it excells in: Catching Nigerian Spam. Catching Spam where the spammer includes a lot of text to confuse bayesian filters. Correctly identifying newsletters containing advertising as nonspam. It learns much faster. With a little hand training - it's almost 100% accurate. I can post more of the details if I get some interest - but - this works and it's time to look at bayesian filters differently. And time to think about multiple filters working on different parts of the message. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
