http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4099
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-23 18:13 ------- Subject: Re: New: ALL_TRUSTED broken: barely hitting any ham On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 04:28:14PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 0.001 0.0000 0.0049 0.000 0.44 -2.40 ALL_TRUSTED:theo > 0.004 0.0000 0.0106 0.000 0.45 -2.40 ALL_TRUSTED:quinlan > 0.004 0.0000 0.0138 0.000 0.45 -2.40 ALL_TRUSTED:parkerm > 0.025 0.0000 0.0500 0.000 0.49 -2.40 ALL_TRUSTED:jm > 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -2.40 ALL_TRUSTED:hbayle > 0.253 0.0000 0.4580 0.000 0.55 -2.40 ALL_TRUSTED:daf > 0.035 0.0000 0.2589 0.000 0.48 -2.40 ALL_TRUSTED:bzoetekouw So is the issue that we think it's not hitting as much as it should, or that it doesn't hit much at all? What surprises me here is how high the numbers for daf and bzoetekouw are. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
