http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2586
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-07 01:33 ------- Some of the rules look pretty darn good, actually, worth merging into the advance fee rules. 0.484 0.5926 0.0000 1.000 0.74 1.00 __NIG_NAME_IS_MR_b2586_c6 0.472 0.5772 0.0000 1.000 0.74 1.00 __MY_NAME_IS_MR_b2586_c3 0.383 0.4676 0.0025 0.995 0.71 1.00 __MY_NEXT_OF_KIN_b2586_c3 0.110 0.1339 0.0012 0.991 0.59 1.00 __NIG_BANK_NAME_b2586_c6 0.108 0.1322 0.0012 0.991 0.59 1.00 __MY_BANK_NAME_b2586_c3 0.105 0.1286 0.0000 1.000 0.59 1.00 __NIG_OPERATE_ACCT_b2586_c6 0.105 0.1284 0.0000 1.000 0.59 1.00 __MY_OPERATE_ACCT_b2586_c3 0.094 0.1151 0.0000 1.000 0.57 1.00 __NIG_OVERINVOICED_b2586_c6 0.093 0.1137 0.0000 1.000 0.57 1.00 __MY_OVERINVOICED_b2586_c3 0.080 0.0977 0.0000 1.000 0.56 1.00 __NIG_SOLICIT_b2586_c6 0.069 0.0839 0.0000 1.000 0.55 1.00 __NIG_EXEC_TRANSACT_b2586_c6 0.069 0.0839 0.0000 1.000 0.55 1.00 __MY_EXEC_TRANSACT_b2586_c3 0.049 0.0604 0.0000 1.000 0.53 1.00 __NIG_FURNISH_YOU_b2586_c6 0.049 0.0604 0.0000 1.000 0.53 1.00 __MY_FURNISH_YOU_b2586_c3 I'd definitely those, maybe drop a few of the ones in SVN afterwards (keep the number of body rules constant or lower). The advance fee rules are a bit tricky since there are so many, I ended up writing a program last time around (maybe I should have kept it) to determine which rules could be dropped without lowering efficacy. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
