http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4099
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-07 10:40 -------
Subject: Re: ALL_TRUSTED broken: barely hitting any ham
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 11:34:42PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 0.006 0.0070 0.0000 1.000 0.39 -0.01 T_NO_RELAYS:theo
>
> quinlan, theo, can you check your hits?
The ham all legitimately doesn't relay. It's all on the local machine and has
a single Received header:
Received: by eclectic.kluge.net (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 93E0741469C; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:27:11 -0500 (EST)
The spam hits are all on mails that shouldn't be in the corpus, unfortunately
(blowback-related). :( Have to work out a way to filter that stuff.
> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/ruleqa?s_details=on&s_all=on&date=20050205&rule=%2FT_UNPARSEABLE&g=Change
>
> 13.349 14.5281 4.0181 0.783 0.55 0.01 T_UNPARSEABLE_RELAY:theo
>
> not so interesting IMO. but still, ham hits means our parser is missing
> something (quite a lot in Rod's case)
Hrm. Is there an easy script, for instance, that would report out the lines
that aren't parsing?
Going through a couple by hand:
Received: from dc-mail-3102.iad3.amazon.com by mail-store-2001.amazon.com with
ESMTP
(peer crosscheck: dc-mail-3102.iad3.amazon.com)
Received: from GWGC6-MTA by gc6.jefferson.co.us
with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:09:15 -0700
Received: from no.name.available by [165.224.43.143]
via smtpd (for [165.224.216.89]) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:06:39
-0500
Received: from no.name.available by [165.224.216.88]
via smtpd (for lists.sourceforge.net [66.35.250.206]) with ESMTP;
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:42:30 -0500
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
