http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3969
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-07 12:48 ------- Subject: Re: header checks only check first header On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:59:58AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > header TESTSTRING Header =~ /^Teststring/m > > /^/ doesn't make sense in this case, and SA is working as it should. closing > bug. Hrm. I don't quite know if the ticket should be closed yet or not. It's true that to solve the issue, the rule could just have "m" at the end, but the bigger, potential, issue is that all of our rules which do "^" or "$", or "." for that matter, need to have "m" and "s" modifiers to deal with things like: Subject: hot Subject: young Subject: sluts or whatever. /hot young sluts/ doesn't match currently, neither will /hot.*young.*sluts/, etc. IMO, the issue is less "make the rule work now" and more of "counter possible future obfuscations". Part of me cares what the MUA does (probably shows "Subject: sluts"), but the other part of me wants to catch the whole thing. Am I over thinking this? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
