[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:

> - - I'd presume you intend it to be a static site; no dynamic
>   (CGI/mod_perl/PHP/whatever) components.   If so, say so; the page
>   doesn't mention it. 

Yes, definitely.  We don't need dynamic content.
   
>   I hope that's the case, btw, as moving to something like postnuke would
>   mean security nightmares, slowness, vulnerability to slashdotting, and
>   no ability to make changes remotely and offline using svn.  I'd be
>   -1 on that.

Agreed.
 
> - - the "more standard set of top-level pages" doesn't seem to relate to our
>   content very well.   Unless you want the web designer to also rewrite
>   the content text, I don't think that's a good suggestion.   If you *do*
>   want them to do that, then point that out ;)

I think some restructuring will do most of the job with rewrites so
things make sense, but if someone does a more complete rewrite and the
effect is good, of course I'd like it.
 
> - - I'd prefer to move more stuff into the wiki, myself.

Agreed, I want the main site to be top-level information that doesn't
change often.
 
> I'm pretty underwhelmed as to whether this is a priority, overall.

It's not critical, but I do think it's needed badly.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/

Reply via email to