[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes: > - - I'd presume you intend it to be a static site; no dynamic > (CGI/mod_perl/PHP/whatever) components. If so, say so; the page > doesn't mention it.
Yes, definitely. We don't need dynamic content. > I hope that's the case, btw, as moving to something like postnuke would > mean security nightmares, slowness, vulnerability to slashdotting, and > no ability to make changes remotely and offline using svn. I'd be > -1 on that. Agreed. > - - the "more standard set of top-level pages" doesn't seem to relate to our > content very well. Unless you want the web designer to also rewrite > the content text, I don't think that's a good suggestion. If you *do* > want them to do that, then point that out ;) I think some restructuring will do most of the job with rewrites so things make sense, but if someone does a more complete rewrite and the effect is good, of course I'd like it. > - - I'd prefer to move more stuff into the wiki, myself. Agreed, I want the main site to be top-level information that doesn't change often. > I'm pretty underwhelmed as to whether this is a priority, overall. It's not critical, but I do think it's needed badly. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
