http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3976
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-23 00:15 ------- Subject: Re: [RFE] Invisible URIs should tend to be ignored > Could we possibly ignore invisble URIs instead of processing them, on > the theory that they're pretty much useless? Recent spams have been > sited by Dave Funk having 50-100 invisible URIs like: <A > href="http://garbage.sitename.tld";></A>. Right now, we do the fairly safe thing of choosing the maximum number of domains randomly from the list. Eliminating invisible ones would be a potential disaster since spammers might be able to figure out a way to make domains appear to be invisible to our renderer, but be VISIBLE in some mail programs. I'd favor an approach that would give slightly better odds (like 2-to-1) for more visible URLs over less visible URLs, but I think a larger shift would be too juicy a reward and possibly lead to a lesser disaster. Daniel ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
