I've rather intentionally ignored this thread completely, but I'll chime in for a minute.
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 05:03:41AM +0800, Shelby Moore wrote:
> Thus, on the one hand, I can argue that our proposal is equivalent to Razor,
> and thus to be fair you either include ours (or you disable Razor... but I am
> not suggesting this).
There is nothing about "fairness" in what's included.
> A) Make a plugin
Yes.
> B) Include in main (as done for Razor), but set it OFF by default
No.
> And I suggest we have discussion (in other thread) whether Razor should be a
> plugin also. But this is not a religious thing for me. I do NOT view
> Razor/CloudMark as a competitor at all.
No. We're pretty good about making decisions for what should and
shouldn't be a plugin already. To cut this short, Razor *is* a plugin
already. As is DCC, Pyzor, DomainKeys, AWL, the URIBL code, etc.
If you want to code up a plugin and offer it up for inclusion in the
standard release, great, I'd love to see it. Whether or not it's
included in mainline, or merely listed on the Wiki as a "third-party"
plugin, is a different issue entirely. But it's rather moot to discuss
what we may or may not do based on something that doesn't exist yet, IMO.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"The Excalibur accellerates at roughly the speed of plot."
- JMS about "Crusade"
pgpb0v3EKiSor.pgp
Description: PGP signature
