Malte S. Stretz wrote: [snip]
> But I must admit that I stopped reading your >other thread after I read the words "patent", "(tm)" So you are against trademarks. Okay. So I thus may use your name without your permission and pretend to be you? > and "100% >Accurate" I did not write that in this dev list. If you are referring to our web site, then it clearly says: http://www.accuspam.com/faq.php#as_spam The only way to get absolute 100% spam blocking is to configure "Daily Summary" ON and "SMTP integration". In that case, the false negatives (undetected spam) is sent in a Daily Summary. It helps to read before you make cynical judgements. > (just before your MUA stopped to add In-Reply-To headers and the >thread was broken), I am using Eudora. It is used by millions. My point stands that if you add Sender: header to ezlm, then it will work better. That is a fact. so it might be a good idea if you also wrote some more >technical description with less buzzwords so one can easily find out what >AccuSpam(tm) is actually about and how it works. I guess you did not read where we wrote that AccuTechnology is what we are proposing, not AccuSpam. [snip] > (Even if we don't include >it in the core, you will have a plugin which your customers can easily add >to their SpamAssassin installation.) Yes that is cool. I am more concerned at this juncture (due to the continued belligerent attitude towards me) with evaluating the attitude here. I am wondering it is possible have harmony and good working relationships. To depend on investment not being subverted in future. I certainly am trying. I sense a religious fervor here to kill anything commercial. That concerns me as a person who runs a for-profit business.
