http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3661





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-03-15 19:36 -------
> I can almost see having two body types: body, which is using the current
rendering, and cleanbody, which uses the cleaned up rendering.

Personally, I'd prefer "body" to be the cleaned up and displayable text, and
"bodytext" (or equivalent) which contains the not-cleaned up text. It'd be
similar to rawbody, except that HTML tags are removed, I expect. As someone who
makes extensive use of obfuscation rules, I'd very much like to think of "body"
as clean text, displayed in the email, and "something else" as the not clean 
text.

Second choice would be for "body" to be the cleaned up and displayable text, and
"body:alltext" or something similar to be the pre-cleanup text. Well, actually,
the more I think about it, I don't see any reason not to prefer this option from
a user's viewpoint.

Most importantly, I'd like to have a new rule which identifies that these two
are different -- body text after cleanup is different from the body text before
cleanup, or maybe something which indicates the contents of the difference. IOW
maybe a body:invisible rule type, which allows us to test the contents of the
text dropped from the cleaned up body text. 

I can think of several rules I'd like to test against body:invisible ...

Bob Menschel




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to