http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4200
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 08:39 ------- One of the projects that support SURBL has mass amounts of data like this. But as posted earlier, the date formats for whois vary on a LARGE scale. We thought we had them all covered and still don't. Caching the dates, and distro'ing like SURBL is possible, but then why not just have them added to SURBL if they are spammy? This is kind of the topic now. If we have all these other way of looking at the data, but it has to be distro'd in an SURBL way, then why not just SURBL? I don't have the answer to that question :) The thought is to have a sort of 'BackendAssassin' net lookup. One that looks at more then just the date in whois, and determines the spammyness of a domain. This is only after it has determined it isn't in SURBL. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
