http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3852
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 18:18 ------- Subject: Re: better way to have user configs On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:35:58PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 'Array values need to have the system array copied into the user space, then > modified. This handles both adds and deletes (think unwhitelist_from, etc.) > Hash values have the same issue as arrays.' > > that is very slow when switching users; performing lookups in both hashes is > more efficient overall. How do you handle deletes then? There's no way to mark that something has been taken out of the system array. The hashes aren't so bad, since I don't think we actually delete keys from hashes, but we definitely delete elements from arrays. > also, IMO we'd be better off without Storable. there are certainly bugs in > that > code, I'm almost certain it's behind the hyperthreading hangs -- and I think > we're stressing it more than anyone else is. Agreed. > btw I have a patch that implements all this, but since it's part of my McAfee > work, it's stuck waiting for approval there. :( :( ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
