-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Malte S. Stretz writes:
> On Tuesday 22 March 2005 19:15 CET Justin Mason wrote:
> > Theo Van Dinter writes:
> > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 06:00:36AM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > bug 3409: modify header ordering for DomainKeys compatibility, by
> > > > placing markup headers at the top of the message
> > >
> > > Hrm.  I don't think we want our headers at the very top, since adding
> > > Received headers will get broken up, etc?
> >
> > that's part of the idea of treating them as possibly "tracking headers".
> > in other words a recipient can then see where the X-Spam- headers were
> > inserted.
> 
> Why do you check against /^Return-[pP]ath:/ instead of /^Return-Path:/i?  I 
> think these headers were case sensitive in RFC 822 but since 2822 all 
> headers should be matched case insensitive (even if not, we should do so 
> IMO).

good point.  will fix that now...

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFCQIlNMJF5cimLx9ARAsOZAKC7Ksw10MNuL/VXkyv8Jr5y7mdfDwCfeo/d
twDIbSCtZZ6h4NJSZ0PxXiQ=
=1ars
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to