-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Malte S. Stretz writes: > On Tuesday 22 March 2005 19:15 CET Justin Mason wrote: > > Theo Van Dinter writes: > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 06:00:36AM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > bug 3409: modify header ordering for DomainKeys compatibility, by > > > > placing markup headers at the top of the message > > > > > > Hrm. I don't think we want our headers at the very top, since adding > > > Received headers will get broken up, etc? > > > > that's part of the idea of treating them as possibly "tracking headers". > > in other words a recipient can then see where the X-Spam- headers were > > inserted. > > Why do you check against /^Return-[pP]ath:/ instead of /^Return-Path:/i? I > think these headers were case sensitive in RFC 822 but since 2822 all > headers should be matched case insensitive (even if not, we should do so > IMO). good point. will fix that now... - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFCQIlNMJF5cimLx9ARAsOZAKC7Ksw10MNuL/VXkyv8Jr5y7mdfDwCfeo/d twDIbSCtZZ6h4NJSZ0PxXiQ= =1ars -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
