http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-29 15:59 ------- Okay, I finished my performance testing. First raw results: the test was: for x in 1 2 3 4; do rndc flush; /usr/bin/time perl ./mass-check -f /tmp/corpus --head=250 --net -j 8 -n; rename "s/.log/-$x-a.log/" spam.log ham.log; /usr/bin/time perl ./mass-check -f /tmp/corpus --head=250 --net -j 8 -n; rename "s/.log/-$x-b.log/" spam.log ham.log; done /usr/bin/time format is wall,user,system,major,minor before: 140.94,89.04,3.46,1403,83237 102.99,90.53,3.20,1405,83109 140.35,89.34,3.38,1404,83420 106.37,91.63,3.31,1403,83236 141.18,90.05,2.88,1403,83498 100.68,90.93,3.08,1404,83519 143.86,88.51,3.33,1403,83542 105.60,91.06,3.44,1404,83234 after: 113.70,90.19,3.87,1405,83242 102.04,89.78,3.14,1404,83020 121.37,90.90,3.49,1406,83397 102.49,89.69,3.47,1405,83180 118.91,90.80,3.15,1403,83294 101.01,90.04,3.17,1402,83266 114.44,90.54,3.79,1403,83558 100.89,89.89,3.34,1403,83215 total times across 4 runs: wall, before, flushed 566.33 wall, after, flushed 468.42 -> 83% time wall, before, cached 415.64 wall, after, cached 406.43 -> 98% time user, before, flushed 356.94 user, after, flushed 362.43 -> 102% time user, before, cached 364.15 user, after, cached 359.4 -> 99% time So, all but one case improves, so major thumbs up on performance! However, I got this twice during the flushed runs *after* applying the patch and no times before applying the patch: uridnsbl: bogus rr: domain=xenl.com, zone=multi.surbl.org., rr=ns1.namesbeyond.com. 172800 IN A 216.220.62.166 at ../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSBL.pm line 619. uridnsbl: bogus rr: domain=isipp.com, zone=multi.surbl.org., rr=ns5.cliq.com. 172798 IN A 131.161.250.103 at ../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSBL.pm line 619. I am running a local bind9 (9.2.1-2 from Debian). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
