http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4221
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-31 12:17 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > why is this an issue? moot if this is fixed in forthcoming 3.1, but for the sake of response, it is an issue because it contributes to false positives for RFC compliant MTAs that otherwise fail to pass the SA regex as reported. this has been seen in the wild, and is how I discovered the bug. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
