http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |triage
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-07 23:25 -------
> Ham rules are okay if they cannot be used by spammers. We only have a few of
those.
Actually, "we" have lots of those. I use several dozen myself. As long as
they're private, mostly domain- or system-specific, and not readily forgeable,
then they work fine.
And in those cases, flagged with tflags nice, the hit frequencies ranking
algorithms work just fine for me.
Questions to the devs: If the simpler ranking algorithm is used, should the IG
algorithm be removed from the program?
If the IG algorithm is used in specific cases, should it be replaced with
Quang-Anh's suggestion for those cases?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
