http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4260
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-13 16:47 ------- 'I think, without looking through it very carefully, that what I just described contains very little change to the existing code while still reducing the number of sockets to two per process and without introducing an event model.' yeah, it would certainly be easier -- not *quite* as easy as you think though, since you still need to replace the current select()/bgisready model with a new polling model that understands that when a socket is ready, it mightn't be the desired answer that's ready to be read. that (IMO) is the big change that we can't avoid if we do single-socket. But yes, that's pretty much what I was thinking of implementing for *this* bug anyway ;) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
