http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4246
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-14 02:37 ------- > My ISP recently did something to increase the number of processes SA was using > and that has _dramatically_ helped... but I'm still getting the occasional > bounce. In that case your problem is that Exim isn't backing off when spamd is busy. You can probably avoid overwhelming spamd by manipulating exim's load controls, e.g. by running in queue_only mode and using queue_run_max to limit the number of queue runners and therefore the number of concurrent deliveries. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
