On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 09:54:12PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > I've done 1 run at 14 days with the patch, and no problems found. I'll run > another time or two and see what happens. It takes a good couple of hours to > do a single 14 day run though. <sigh>
The second run had no errors either. I have not verified that I get the same (or near same) results though. I'm rerunning without the patch as well, just to see if it was a random occurance before. The patch does make things *much* slower though, around 3x: With (~3h): status: starting run stage now: 2005-04-25 08:55:58 PM status: 10% ham: 337 spam: 2232 date: 2005-04-13 now: 2005-04-25 09:15:27 PM status: 20% ham: 674 spam: 4464 date: 2005-04-14 now: 2005-04-25 09:34:16 PM status: 30% ham: 1011 spam: 6696 date: 2005-04-15 now: 2005-04-25 09:53:43 PM status: 40% ham: 1347 spam: 8929 date: 2005-04-17 now: 2005-04-25 10:14:25 PM status: 50% ham: 1684 spam: 11161 date: 2005-04-18 now: 2005-04-25 10:33:53 PM status: 60% ham: 2021 spam: 13393 date: 2005-04-20 now: 2005-04-25 10:53:15 PM status: 70% ham: 2358 spam: 15625 date: 2005-04-21 now: 2005-04-25 11:12:21 PM status: 80% ham: 2695 spam: 17857 date: 2005-04-22 now: 2005-04-25 11:31:29 PM status: 90% ham: 3031 spam: 20090 date: 2005-04-23 now: 2005-04-25 11:50:28 PM status: 100% ham: 3367 spam: 22314 date: 2005-04-25 now: 2005-04-26 12:09:24 AM status: completed run stage now: 2005-04-26 12:09:29 AM Without (~1h): status: starting run stage now: 2005-04-25 04:28:05 PM status: 10% ham: 338 spam: 2231 date: 2005-04-12 now: 2005-04-25 04:34:47 PM status: 20% ham: 675 spam: 4463 date: 2005-04-14 now: 2005-04-25 04:40:59 PM status: 30% ham: 1010 spam: 6697 date: 2005-04-14 now: 2005-04-25 04:47:13 PM status: 40% ham: 1348 spam: 8928 date: 2005-04-17 now: 2005-04-25 04:53:57 PM status: 50% ham: 1685 spam: 11160 date: 2005-04-18 now: 2005-04-25 04:59:41 PM status: 60% ham: 2022 spam: 13392 date: 2005-04-20 now: 2005-04-25 05:05:41 PM status: 70% ham: 2358 spam: 15625 date: 2005-04-21 now: 2005-04-25 05:11:14 PM status: 80% ham: 2695 spam: 17857 date: 2005-04-22 now: 2005-04-25 05:16:55 PM status: 90% ham: 3032 spam: 20089 date: 2005-04-23 now: 2005-04-25 05:22:06 PM status: 100% ham: 3367 spam: 22314 date: 2005-04-25 now: 2005-04-25 05:27:35 PM status: completed run stage now: 2005-04-25 05:27:36 PM Without the patch, lots of issues starting after 80%. I'm thinking that a per-request ID isn't necessary, but a per instance ID is -- either initialized at check() or whenever the module gets a new instance setup. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: A writer thinks of critics as a tree feels about dogs.
pgpVfvVqaitwX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
