FWIW, I'm +0 on releasing 3.0.3 vs 3.0.4. As far as I'm concerned, until the release manager actually sends it out, it is just a number.
Daniel Quinlan wrote: > 3. scrap 3.0.3 and package a 3.0.4 with the patch and call for votes for 3.0.4 [...] > #3 seems silly That's the one thing I disagree with. I see nothing silly about taking the work that has gone into 3.0.3 so far, deciding that there is a reason not to ship it, and having that work plus just a little bit more go into producing a version that is numbered 3.0.4 before shipping. The only silliness I see is the big deal this has turned into. As you said, it is Michael's call. If he decides he wants to release a 3.0.4 instead of a 3.0.3, I would vote +1 for it. Releasing a 3.0.3 would not need my vote. I would think it silly to release both 3.0.3 and immediately release 3.0.4. I won't push for including the DNS fixes for bug 4260 et. al. in a 3.0.x release :-) -- sidney
