http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4302
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-04 10:38 ------- Yes, the -xO4 specifies additional optimization. I have been using it on all the previous versions of SpamAssassin without any problems, but it seems to cause problems here. If I rebuild with -xO2 (which is the same as using -O) the test passes. Gcc also produces a spamc that works. It looks like a bug in Sun's C compiler. It is strange that all of the other spamc/spamd tests work OK, it is just optL that fails. I tried your patch. It eliminates the warning about the unreachable code. It has no effect on test optL failing when built with -xO4. Note that the warning is not issued by gcc, just Sun's C. I will have to see if Sun has patches available for this version of their compiler which is: cc: Forte Developer 7 C 5.4 2002/03/09 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
