http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4153
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-10 10:11 ------- (In reply to comment #20) > disappointing! > > yeah, I guess the separate parser is the way to go, then; IMO it'd be best to > just use that for both config-file and CLI (instead of getopt) so at least we > can share that code. Only other option I can think of is to generate our own argc / argv pair from the CLI and config opts, and pass that to getopt. This would require awkward parsing of all options first though, to make sure duplicates aren't passed in. Of course, this would mean that checking _after_ option parsing isn't necessary, since no duplicates were passed in in the first place. Having not tested this, I'm not sure how it'd work out though. The easiest option, for the moment anyway, is the two separate parsers. Any preferences on which one I should work on to get working? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
