Title: Humorous to me ...
4th - Not overly professional to have your url have "GENERAL_CRAP" as part of it.


From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 5/10/2005 17:19
To: Spamassassin Devel List
Subject: Humorous to me ...

I thought this was funny.  It was in response to a commit message.

First, it's a different spam product.
Second, it's challenge/response (boo!)
Third, it says it's on behalf of me, which it's most clearly not.

General rule: don't run anti-spam lists through anti-spam filters.

Tagline set appropriately. ;)

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:43:07PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm using Spammed! to filter spam from reaching my e-mail inbox.
>
> You just sent me a message with the subject "Re: svn commit: r169334 - in /spamassassin/trunk: MANIFEST lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSBL.pm lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm rules/20_uri_tests.cf t/uri.t t/uri_html.t".
>
> Because you have not yet proven to me that you are human being and not an automated spam sending machine I need you to visit the following web site and answer a quick question that a
> human can answer, but a computer can not. Once you have done this your message will be delivered to me and all future messages will be delivered without having to ever prove to me that you are a
> real human.
>
> The web site you need to visit is: http://verify.spammed.com/?mi=GENERAL_CRAP
>
> Thanks for helping me to clear up my spam problems.
> ---------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED], a user of the Spammed! challenge/response system.
> Individual senders: If you did not send the e-mail in reference, please delete this message and do nothing.
> Commercial senders: This user is utilizing the Spammed! challenge/response system and does not wish to receive any automated e-mails.
>      
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"challenge response is a great way to tell people they are less important
than you"       - Dan Quinlan via IRC

Reply via email to