http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2975
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-11 11:36 ------- Subject: Re: bayes_seen database uncontrolled growth On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:21:38PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd be inclined to veto anything that doesn't include a solution all > around. It seems far too hackish to just throw something for this, > especially since we're talking about recommending the SQL solution > over the Berkeley DB based bayes. We need to do something, but a full seen expiry system isn't going to happen for 3.1. I still like the idea of just letting bayes_seen be optional. If people want to trim it, let them delete the file and have it be recreated. IIRC, the only place that's an issue is when going r/o w/ the DB where it requires the file right now. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
