http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4329
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-13 12:47 -------
Here's the sample headers for this particular message in question ...
It seems the message actually originated from
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 May 2005 13:53:04 -0400
Received: from [130.63.86.28] (helo=silver.cs.yorku.ca ident=root)
by silver.cs.yorku.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
id 1DWHrr-0004Rt-Cq
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 13:53:04 -0400
Received: from CPE000f66a58173-CM0014c99f06a5.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (CPE000f6
6a58174-CM0012c99f06a4.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [70.28.83.15])
by mail.cs.yorku.ca (IMP) with HTTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 12 May 2005 13:53:03 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 13:53:03 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: questions
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.3
X-Originating-IP: 70.28.83.99
----
It seems that this particular message actually originated from our IMP/HORDE
web-based mail system.
Nonetheless, it seems like the rules may need to be updated a bit not to
put such a disadvantage on Rogers Hi Speed users. I'm not quite sure why
the HCC/IP addr 1 rules don't specifically match only those hosts that are
in the comments of the score file? or are those just samples of the rules?
Our mail server does support the auth option, of course, but I'm not sure this
really addresses the problem per se.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
