http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4331
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|[email protected] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-20 14:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=2885)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2885&action=view)
graph of S values
ok, here's a graph, and some figures:
/s015/ fp 37 fn 7 uh 705 us 2188 c 666.30
/base/ fp 24 fn 5 uh 815 us 2647 c 591.20
/s005/ fp 17 fn 4 uh 1046 us 3516 c 630.20
/s003/ fp 16 fn 4 uh 1227 us 4227 c 709.40
/s001/ fp 11 fn 3 uh 1637 us 5482 c 824.90
/s0005/fp 7 fn 2 uh 1953 us 6157 c 883.00
/s0001/fp 4 fn 1 uh 2837 us 7571 c 1081.80
I think we could go to s=0.03 (s003). it does increase the number of spams
marked as unsure (in this case [0.5 .. 0.8]) quite a lot, but IMO it's worth it
just to reduce the FPs and FNs, since now we can count on other rules like
URIBL to catch a lot of the spams bayes misses.
votes please!
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
