http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4347
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-25 20:36 ------- Subject: Re: many config options are not validated -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > Currently the the validation, based on what the Conf.pm POD says/infers, > requires an @ in the address. So "procmail*" isn't valid according to > the validation. > > I don't know if the test should be changed or if the validation code > should be changed. > I disagree on your interpretation of the docs. It even has *.domain.net as an example. The validation code needs to be changed. Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFClUQbG4km+uS4gOIRAs0HAJ48nBfZ5n+/lZEb1jCx7D8dWwry1gCfSybv PWPZuX8RqVH9Eyuf0lhapPY= =GpDe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
