On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 04:35:04AM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote: > I'm -1 on this. We are close enough to 3.1 that that would be a pointless > waste of time.
We've been "close enough to 3.1" for ages, and a 3.1 release doesn't help fix the bugs in 3.0 which people will continue to use. > done with that, we really don't need another one. These bugs are > relatively minor. Actually some are relatively major. > Dan was ready to prepare a pre-release for 3.1.0 (until people started > checking tons of code in anticipation...) We are close to 3.1.0. We The bigger issue is that trunk was unstable at that point. spamd still exhibits random lock ups, for instance. > don't need this distraction. Also, if we lasted so long between 3.0.2 What distraction? There are a handful of patches left (mostly backports from 3.1), and then the code is ready to go. There's someone (me) who's willing to be the RM for 3.0.4... So how is this a distraction? For a group who from previous conversations wanted to do the "release often" thing, there seems to be a lot of resistance to releasing bug fix versions... The original plan starting with 2.6 was to do this kind of thing monthly, and new feature releases every 3-6 months, as a "fwiw". We've not gotten anywhere close to that schedule. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: If you wish to succeed, consult three old people.
pgpT7E4fq77WJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
