http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4386
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-03 08:40 ------- Subject: Re: New rule suggestion: detect mismatched URIs and onMouseOver On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 08:22:39AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > but checking just the protocol/host part of the URI would probably be > sufficient. The chance of FPs then would seem much smaller for legitimate ham. That's actually what I was talking about. The FP rate is horrible. > I don't think it would be required to match the whole extract with the use of > status etc. I think the presence of onmouseover anywhere is probably a > sufficient indicator that this mail is irregular. I have 0 hits for my personal ham, but several FPs on my hamtrap mails: CNN, go.com, Simon & Schuster, etc. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
