http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3139
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-05 08:23 ------- After seeing more and more hide technics, I think we should also think about skipping the 'invisible' in the bayes filter. Often the invisible parts are just 'bayes poisening' and have no other reason: <font face="verdana" size="3"> via<span style="display:none;">allotting greenware rivulet dreamy blend tungsten nettlesome todd bogeymen chap facet age geisha iconoclast cassandra sampson adjudge taxpaying arcana disparage shank leafy crude zounds abraham oshkosh manitoba discuss aventine steven tyranny assimilable transposable bstj help opine kaolinite tenant bask transshipped 92581</span>gra and vi<span style="display:none;">wept banks automotive blame agamemnon chungking create colossus extinct shown marquis bernard babel awhile hamilton bengali incurred burlesque suction attendee tempera bacteria bowel retinue lyon bimini fief amphibology inclement free wingman archibald beauty cb ike cover depressant </span>codin are very cheap today. So I wonder if this handled by spamassassin 3.1 already ? We should strip away 'span display none' parts, strip away invisible font and color parts and only feed the remaining 'visible' part to the bayes filter. This way we would have 'again' better bayes results for HTML mails. What do you think about this idea ? Martin ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
