hi theo,
% svn info
Revision: 180201
I'm assuming this is what you're complaining about?
<squeaky-wheel> who be complainin' ?! ;-) </squeaky-wheel>
If so, yes, that's expected. The svn version isn't the version of the WC,
ok, i give up. "WC" ?
it's the last version where SpamAssassin.pm was changed.
iiuc, you mean the last revision?
does it not make sense to have the reported version represent the _actual_
'overall' code revision? or is there a reason for "limiting" it to the "last
version where SpamAssassin.pm was changed".
also, is it then correct/safe to assume that the "old version" of OpenSSL
referenced in spamc's 'readable bits' has _nothing_ to do with my build/env?
thx,
richard
