On Sunday 19 June 2005 22:03 CET Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 09:04:28PM +0200, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> > The tag is also missing.
>
> ?
>
> $ svn ls http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/tags
> [...]
> spamassassin_prerelease_3_1_0_pre_1/
Oh. I just looked at the end of the list, the 3.0 prereleases were tagged
as "_release_", too. I think we should get some kind of schma into the tag
naming. We now have, alphabetically:
[..]
spamassassin_pre_2_4_0b/
spamassassin_prerelease_3_1_0_pre_1/
spamassassin_release_1_4_0/
[...]
spamassassin_release_3_0_0_pre1/
spamassassin_release_3_0_0_pre2/
spamassassin_release_3_0_0_pre_3/
spamassassin_release_3_0_0_pre_4/
spamassassin_release_3_0_0_rc4/
spamassassin_release_3_0_0_rc_1/
spamassassin_release_3_0_0_rc_2/
spamassassin_release_3_0_0rc3/
What do you think if we just named the release tags x.y.z-foo where foo is
the version_tag we added for prereleases, release candidates, whatever.
Ie. whatever
spamassassin --version | head -n 1 | cut -d' ' -f3
says.
The other tags we currently have we can just drop IMO.
Malte
--
[SGT] Simon G. Tatham: "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
<http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html>
[ESR] Eric S. Raymond: "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way"
<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
