http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4449
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-01 11:16 ------- > However, just because something "could results in > false positives" isn't enough IMO to drop a TLD. > "com" would be an obvious entry in that category > for instance. right, thats why i said ccTLDs.. the odds are much better that 2 letter country codes are more likely to hit random STRING.CC entries due to 1) less chars after period: 2 (cctlds) versus 3-7 (gtlds) 2) number of tlds available: 245 (cctlds) versus 15 (gtlds) if someone misses a spacebar and the next sentance starts with a common two letter word like 'TO', 'IT', 'DO', 'AT', 'SO', or 'US'. "Say hi to them.It will make their day!" it would not only produce an unneeded DNS query, but it also could produce a FP hit. # host -tTXT them.it.multi.uribl.com them.it.multi.uribl.com descriptive text "Listed on [black] - See http://lookup.uribl.com/?domain=them.it"; i'm not so much worried about FP's against the URIBL's.. i'm more worried about unneeded DNS queries. Imagine a site (like rulesemporium.com) that passes info about rulesets around via email all day long. anyhow.. i'm just bringing things up as i see them... so like i said, use INVALID as necessary d ;) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
