-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Nix writes: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Theo Van Dinter spake: > > 18 months ago would be Jan 1 2004, not 2003. We also usually limit to > > 6 months, not 18, but ... > > Six months isn't much for ham at all, is it? That would only give me a > thousand or so hams, and more than a hundred times as much spam as ham. > > This seems a little... unbalanced. Ham doesn't change *that* fast. > > (Maybe I should suck a few mailing lists into the ham, but I'm chary of > that because many of those lists may also be being used by others as > ham sources, so it may lead to duplication.) Yeah, I'm not sure we had such a stringent limit on *ham*. Spam of course is different, but iirc old ham isn't such a big problem. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFCxd/4MJF5cimLx9ARAg4VAJ0RDG3Stam3cYpyeQsB8b78urisGgCdEIx6 kTMC84//qtjI4p/3UNQJeas= =zHk+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
