http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3874
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-03 15:08 -------
Subject: Re: Definitions of internal/trusted networks too vague
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 09:18:11PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Triage: Given no response from Tim, I'm setting severity to
> Enhancement, and milestone to Future. Someone with a better
> understanding of networks and the many possibilities should hopefully
> prepare a comprehensive wiki page describing the types of scenarios
> that could be seen, and how internal_networks and trusted_networks
> should be set for each.
Sorry for not responding. When you sent the first email I looked at the
page and it didn't really answer the question, but I didn't get round to
doing anything about it.
Since then it appears Justin has put some more detail up and the page
now gives a difference between trusted and internal networks:
* set 'internal_networks' to include the hosts that act as MX
for your domains, or that may deliver mail internally in your
organisation.
* set 'trusted_networks' to include the same hosts and networks
as 'internal_networks', with the addition of some hosts that
are external to your organisation which you trust to not be
under the control of spammers. For example, very high-volume
mail relays at other ISPs, or mailing list servers.
These descriptions look good to me - but I'm not sure I fully
understood it in the first place to know whether they're correct :)
Tim.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
