http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4469





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-07-08 10:51 -------
Subject: Re:  Add a process/option to efficiently deal with very long mail 
messages

> > This would allow us to scan even 100MB mails without breaking a sweat
and
> > causing all those FAQs on the users list. ;)
>
> Well, yes and no.  There's still the hit of storing the message in memory,
> at least once, when it's initially read in.  We could store the pristine
> body in a temp file, but then any full rules or the rewrite at the end
> will cause that to come back in.
>
> SA is really tuned for "everything in memory".

Which is why I suggested doing this in spamd and just passing the
'reasonable size' to SA itself.  It eliminates all those niggling worries
about some line of code somewhere suddenly sucking in 100mb of text to a
hash or the like.





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to